Twenty years ago, Professor Steven D. Smith published Law’s Quandary. Smith argued that, while we claim to believe in legal theories that spurn the classical understanding of law, we in fact think and act in ways that presume that classical understanding. Incisive in its diagnosis and prophetic in its anticipation of future trends, Law’s Quandary remains as relevant today as it was two decades ago. Join CIT and The American Enterprise Institute for an exploration of Law’s Quandary’s continued significance to legal thought.