Immediately following the landmark Loper Bright decision, CIT Managing Director Chad Squitieri published an article entitled A Loper Bright Future for Statutory Interpretation in Law & Liberty.
Prof. Squirieri writes, “The Supreme Court’s 1984 opinion in Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. was not supposed to be revolutionary. Justice John Paul Stevens, the opinion’s author, initially thought the case to involve an application of “pretty-well settled law” to a “very careful study of the facts.” But over time, as portions of the Chevron opinion were analyzed apart from their initial factual context, the case was transformed into a full-fledged doctrine of substantial and controversial import.” You can read the full piece here.