The discussion, titled “Is This the End of Humphrey’s Executor? The Impact of Trump v. Slaughter Ahead of Oral Arguments,” delved into a precedent that has fundamentally shaped independent federal agencies. Alongside other legal scholars, Prof. Alicea examined the historical and structural implications of Humphrey’s Executor, its profound impact on modern governance, and what a post-Humphrey‘s landscape could mean for the separation of powers.
This timely conversation provided critical insights ahead of the Supreme Court’s oral arguments, highlighting the significant stakes for executive power and federal agency accountability.
